Featured Post

A Personalised Induction Will Always Be More Effective Essay Example for Free

A Personalized Induction Will Always Be More Effective Essay Each fruitful hypnotherapy meeting must have an enlistment guaranteeing that...

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

A Personalised Induction Will Always Be More Effective Essay Example for Free

A Personalized Induction Will Always Be More Effective Essay Each fruitful hypnotherapy meeting must have an enlistment guaranteeing that the customer is loose and is in a disassociated state all together completely experience the procedure. The sort of acceptance utilized can be subject to the individual inclinations of the specialist or the kind of hypnotherapy being embraced in the meeting. There has been some discussion with regards to whether a nonexclusive enlistment will be reasonable for all customers or as some trance inducers advocate that solitary a customized tirade to every customer will do. Business hypnotherapy which is created for the mass market is broadly accessible in CD, book or e positions. These materials manage basic issues, for example, quitting any pretense of smoking, weight reduction and so forth and by their very nature must be nonexclusive as there is no choice for personalisation. Anyway as there is no specialist present at these meetings, the accomplishment of business non customized tirades can't be surveyed. As I would like to think, business materials can contact numerous individuals however they are progressively about bringing in cash for the individual creating them than about creation a distinction for the person. It is likewise difficult to have a customized enlistment if the specialist is holding a gathering meeting. In mesmerizing the advisor depends on verbal correspondence as opposed to on non-verbal communication. Brain research teacher Albert Mehrabian contemplated correspondence and expressed that how people impart can be separated into amounts; ie words represent 7%, manner of speaking records for 38%, and non-verbal communication represents 55%. Consequently the jargon the advisor utilizes turns out to be crucially essential to how fruitful the treatment will be for the customer. Advisors who incline toward a customized approach accept that planning of the customer is basic particularly in the event that they have no past understanding of hypnotherapy as well as have pre-considered thoughts. Conversation before the meeting is essential to find what the client’s desires are and when fundamental, mollify fears and right their convictions. During this conversation the specialist can likewise test to find the clients’ liked or prevailing methodology. Modalities were characterized by Bandler and Grinder the â€Å"Language of our minds†. (Chrysalis, Module 2). The three significant modalities are, Kinaesthetic (feeling), Visual (sight), Auditory (hearing) just as the two minor modalities of Olfactory (smell) and Gustatory (taste). As people we as a whole have an inclination for the manner in which we see and procedure our encounters and so as to make a customized enlistment, the advisor will attempt to learn the client’s inclination during the underlying meeting and conversation. During the acceptance, the customer may have his eyes shut or the advisor may not be inside sight, so correspondence with the customer utilizing their favored symbolism will assist them with feeling increasingly good. Kinaesthetic individuals have an inclination for jargon which will welcome them to feel. For instance in an enlistment where the customer is in their extraordinary spot outside, you could propose the customer feels the glow of a breeze as it travels through the trees. Though for those with a visual methodology it could be proposed that they envision leaves moving in the warm breeze in the close by trees, while those with a sound-related methodology may feel progressively great on the off chance that it is recommended that they can hear the stir of the leaves when they are moved by the warm breeze. Language and symbolism can likewise negatively affect the customer, Karle and Boys (1987, p45) propose that symbolism is first arranged with the customer to guarantee it is satisfactory and harmonious. The model they use is proposing plunge by methods for utilizing a lift to a customer who is phobic of lifts. In this way it is imperative to have some personalisation in the enlistment. There is, notwithstanding, a danger of mis-making a decision about a person during the underlying meeting and interview that the advisor must know about. The customer may introduce a picture that they think the advisor needs to see; likewise as people our sentiments can change oftentimes for the duration of the day which makes us respond in an unexpected way. What's more, until the advisor increases a more profound comprehension of the customer a really customized enlistment may not be accomplished at this point the customer has effectively arrived at a more profound sleep inducing state. While making an acceptance it is recommended by Karle and Boys (1987) that specialists utilize a method known as â€Å"Compounding† which utilizes all modalities in the tactile depictions and proposals. While the substance of the inductionis one zone which can be customized, the conveyance of the enlistment is likewise a significant effect on how tolerating and agreeable the customer will be. During the underlying meeting and as the connection among customer and advisor develops, the style of acceptance generally fit to the customer ought to be utilized. They are alluded to today as â€Å"Permissive† and â€Å"Authoritarian†. Anyway likewise with the modalities, the style inclination of the advisor will be a significant impact on the style utilized in the enlistment. Sandor Ferenczi, a Hungarian psychoanalyst who rehearsed in the mid 1900s originally explored these styles in the wake of moving ceaselessly from Freudian hypothesis and creating unwinding treatment. He called them ‘maternal’ and ‘paternal’ and utilized them in his enlistment conveyance. He believed the maternal style to sustain, mindful, steady and lenient while he believed fatherly to be immediate, dictator and forceful. (Chrysalis, Module 2). Dave Elman, a phase trance specialist and performer working in 1948, at the greeting of specialists started to take a shot at acceptance procedures. He proceeded in this vocation composing books regarding the matter and instructing understudies up to his demise in 1968. He is notable for utilizing his favored dictator style of enlistment which he adjusted from the sharp orders utilized in stage appears. Then again, Milton Erickson, brought into the world 1901, used the tolerant style of acceptance along with aberrant proposal. He accepted that ‘people must take an interest in their therapy’ and was gifted at utilizing similitudes to help his treatment. Erickson accepted that it was unrealistic deliberately to train the oblivious brain, and that dictator proposals were probably going to be met with opposition. He solidly expressed that the oblivious psyche reacts to openings, openings, analogies and emblematic language. He supported that compelling sleep inducing proposal ought to be cunningly dubious, leaving space for the customer to fill in the holes with their own oblivious understandings regardless of whether they don't intentionally get a handle on what's going on. The gifted trance inducer develops these holes of importance in a manner generally fit to the individual subject in a manner which is well on the way to deliver the ideal change (Wikipedia. rg) Authoritarian acceptances will be progressively directional and telling; they permit the trance inducer to be in control with the customer following a lot of requests. This can function admirably on certain customers who react to power and like set limits. A tyrant enlistment will be direct without any embellishments, for instance offering ordering expressions, for example, ‘Close your eyes, you are in charge at all times’, ‘You are currently feeling relaxed’. Customers who incline toward tyrant styles may have an intelligent inclination; it has likewise been appeared to function admirably for those people who are suspicious. While this methodology may appear to be oppressive, it just makes a deception that the advisor is in all out control. Indeed the customer must be happy to take an interest and in this way is very in charge and can stop the treatment at whenever. When the customer has loose into a trancelike state, proposals and decisions would then be able to be presented. Tolerant enlistments are gentler where the advisor is the facilitator, permitting the customer to settle on their own decisions while in a safe consoling condition fortifying the therapist’s starting conversation with the customer. Sentences utilized will be interesting, for instance, ‘You may get a kick out of the chance to close your eyes now’ or, ‘In your own time pick when to loosen up the muscles in your arms. ’ This style permits utilization of creative situations and analogies. Customers who will react to the lenient style are viewed as commonly mindful, as to please and are creative and have solid symbolism abilities. Immediate and aberrant recommendation can likewise be utilized in the enlistment. Roundabout recommendation can be gainful with customers new to hypnotherapy that are safe either through nervousness or pessimism and when the tyrant approach would not be suitable. Milton Erikson favored backhanded techniques (Chrysalis, Module 2) since he accepted that the customer ought to effectively partake in their treatment. Erickson made various procedures known as ‘techniques of utilisation’ that could be utilized on individuals who appear to be impervious to mesmerizing, regardless of whether they were opposing through tension or willfulness. † Erickson’s strategies were manipulative yet extremely inconspicuous, and permitted the individual customer to assume responsibility for their own mending. He accepted that in the event that one method doesn't work you should discover one that accomplishes work. He had confidence in empowering the opposition that the individual was displaying so they would feel progressively great reacting inside their own limits as opposed to those set by the advisor. In a run of the mill model, a young lady that bit her nails was informed that she was deceiving herself of truly getting a charge out of the nail gnawing. He urged her to let a portion of her nails grow somewhat longer before gnawing them, with the goal that she truly could get the fullest joy from the action. She chose to develop all of her nails long enough that she may truly appreciate gnawing them, and afterward, after certain days, she understood that she didnt need to chomp them in any case. Backhanded sug

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Watergate Essays (2241 words) - Watergate Scandal, John Dean

Watergate Sex, drugs, cash, power, and so on and there is an outrage for it, however think back and you will see that from all the outrages there have been, Watergate was among the most exceedingly awful. The Watergate embarrassment had everything. From Nixon disrespecting the administration by misleading the nation and mishandling his capacity, to his advisory groups being engaged with unlawful acts and a major concealment. All prompting minimal side streets of debasement and falsehoods. Watergate is by a wide margin one of the most noticeably terrible presidential outrages throughout the entire existence of the United States. In the narrative of Watergate, five robbers were discovered breaking into equitable workplaces at the Watergate complex in Washington DC. The sever in was passed as simply one more robbery, however when the criminals were found to have associations with the CIA, questions were beginning to be inquired. At that point when the telephone number of Howard Hunt was found in one of the thieves telephone directories, it made individuals figure, For what reason would one of the robbers have the telephone number of one of the presidents men? Then there is Richard Nixon, the real thing, assumes the job of the leader of the US of America. The man that was casted a ballot into office by the individuals, and the man that pledged to serve the individuals. At the point when Watergate was revealed, it uncovered that the president was a liar and a cheat. The president misled our nation, lied about his inclusion, hid self implicating proof, manhandled his capacity, and planed to have the CIA stop the FBI examinations. He was additionally profoundly engaged with the concealment and still lied about his contribution. During the hours of the disentangling of Watergate, questions were gotten some information about associations with the White House and the president, yet when the president was gotten some information about it at a public interview he guaranteed Americans that The White House has no inclusion whatever in this specific episode. He was lying to the nation like it was an aspect of his responsibilities (Dorman 158). The lying didn't end there, it continued endlessly for quite a long time, and as the outrage continued unwinding, President Nixon and White House, and creep authorities were purposely misdirecting general society about the importance of the Watergate undertaking (158). As Watergate was turning into a first page article in the papers, new proof was being revealed. One bit of proof that changed the people groups thoughts of our president was the tapping of each discussion in the oval office since about the eighteenth month of president Nixon's term (Kutler 368). Those tapes would before long demonstrate that the president was profoundly associated with the embarrassment. During the preliminaries, the Nixon organization guaranteed that the March 21st, 1973 meeting was the main Nixon had known about the smoke screens, yet after the tapes were heard it was found that Nixon was included from the earliest starting point (Legacy 36). The Nixon tapes brought out a lot of contention. The tapes alone could demonstrate the president honest or blameworthy, whichever one it was, Nixon wouldn't hand over the tapes. the courts at that point requested the tapes, and Nixon still would not surrender them. After much battle Nixon consented to give a transcript of the tapes. The transcripts exposed a critical sum of proof against Nixon. The transcripts uncovered adjustments, alliance with the thefts, and the OK's to the concealment, But most significant the transcripts indicated that Nixon had lied over and again after he had denied knowing anything about the scheme (27). After much battle, the courts at long last got the tapes from Nixon, It was Archibald Cox that gave the summon for the tapes, and that began the bloodbath we presently know as the Saturday night slaughter. The evening of October 20,1973, conceivably the most wild in American political history, when the unique Watergate investigator and the countries two top law officials lost their positions inside the space of an hour and a half. (Heritage 38). Before long the nation would locate another issue with the tapes. At the point when the presidents legal counselors were going over the tapes, they went along a brief hole during a discussion with Nixon and Haldman (34). Three weeks after the fact, the hole was found, Rosemary Woods (Nixon's secretary) affirmed that while translating the tape, she had incidentally eradicated maybe five minutes when hindered by a call, she said she had squeezed the ?Record' button rather than the ?Stop' catch and afterward kept her foot on the machines control pedal while talking into the telephone. (34) Not every person acknowledged this clarification; The move would have been troublesome

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

UGA Admissions - The Long Journey - UGA Undergraduate Admissions

UGA Admissions - The Long Journey - UGA Undergraduate Admissions UGA Admissions The Long Journey In the past, I have used the image of a long cross country trip when looking at the Admissions process, and how we would not know the exact arrival time until we were almost to the destination. Now picture the Admissions process as a road trip with three legs to the journey. The first leg is Early Action, and we are now right at the end of that part of the trip. The second leg is a little shorter, and finishes up in late February when we review all Regular Decision and deferred EA applicants to see if they now meet Early Action admission standards (some EA defers will have a jump in their SAT/ACT scores that could shift them to admit). The last leg is the hardest, as it is the file reading part of the trip, and it does not finish up until mid-late March when final decisions are released. So please know that UGA will not be done with the entire freshman admission decisions after we make our Early Action decisions. We will be done with the Early Action leg of the trip, but we are still a long way from being done with final decisions! We will still be receiving a large number of RD applications, deferred EA students will be completing their part II sections, we will be reviewing transcripts, reading essays, doing holistic reviews, etc. So if you are deferred, please know that we still have a lot of admission decisions to make! My rough estimate based on prior years is that will still be admitting a large number of freshmen after EA decisions. As well, please know that UGA will be treating deferred EA and RD applicants the same during the next steps of the process. The rumor always hits that deferred applicants will now be put at the back of the line behind RD applicants, so let me just cut that off now and let you know that is incorrect. Again, in the next stages of the admission process, we will look at deferred EA (who then complete their file) and RD applicants in the same way. In addition, I heavily suggest that any deferred applicants that start comparing themselves to people who were admitted and questioning the decisions remember that UGA has a full view of everything in an applicants file, from the various SAT/ACT subscores, and problem areas such as a D/F grade, lower grades that are out of balance with strong test scores, an applicants overall curriculum, and more detailed information about their overall information, while others only have a partial and sometimes inaccurate view of things. This is just my suggestion, and you do not have to follow it, but it comes from 25+ years of talking with families about decisions. Go Dawgs! P.S. To quote Forrest Gump,Im pretty tiredI think Ill go home now.

Sunday, May 24, 2020

How to Get Recommendation Letters for Grad School

Recommendation letters are a critical part of the graduate school application. If you are planning on applying to grad school, think about who you will ask for letters of recommendation well before you begin preparing your graduate school application. Make contact with professors during the first two years of college and develop relationships, as you will rely on them to write recommendation letters that will land you a spot in the graduate program of your choice. Every graduate program requires applicants to submit recommendation letters. Dont underestimate the importance of these letters. While your transcript, standardized test scores, and admissions essay are vital components of your graduate school application, an excellent recommendation letter can make up for weaknesses in any of these areas. Requirements A well-written recommendation letter provides admissions committees with information that isnt found elsewhere in the application. It is a detailed discussion, from a faculty member, of the personal qualities, accomplishments, and experiences that make you unique and perfect for the programs to which youve applied. A helpful letter of recommendation provides insights that cannot be gleaned by simply reviewing an applicants transcript  or standardized test scores. Moreover, a recommendation can validate a candidates admissions essay. Whom to Ask Most graduate programs require at least two—and more commonly three—recommendation letters. Most students find choosing professionals to write recommendations difficult. Consider faculty members, administrators, internship/cooperative education supervisors, and employers. The people you ask to write your recommendation letters should: Know you wellKnow you long enough to write with authorityKnow your workDescribe your work positivelyHave a high opinion of youKnow where you are applyingKnow your educational and career goalsBe able to favorably compare you with your peersBe well-knownBe able to write a good letter No one person will satisfy all of these criteria. Aim for a set of recommendation letters that cover the range of your skills. Ideally, letters should cover your academic and scholastic skills, research abilities and experiences, and applied experiences (such as cooperative education, internships, and related work experience). For example, a student who is applying to a Master of Social Work program or a program in clinical psychology might include recommendations from faculty who can attest to her research skills as well as recommendation letters from faculty or supervisors who can speak to her clinical skills and potential. How to Ask There are good and bad ways of approaching faculty to ask for a letter of recommendation. Time your request well: Dont corner professors in the hallway or immediately before or after class. Request an appointment, explaining that youd like to discuss your plans for graduate school. Save the official request and explanation for that meeting. Ask the professor if he knows you well enough to write a meaningful and helpful recommendation letter. Pay attention to his demeanor. If you sense reluctance, thank him and ask someone else. Remember that it is best to ask early in the semester. As the end of the semester approaches, faculty may hesitate because of time restraints. Also be aware of common mistakes students make when requesting recommendation letters, such as asking too close to the admissions deadline. Make the request at least a month ahead of time, even if you dont have your application materials composed or your final list of programs selected. Provide Information   The best thing that you can do to ensure that your recommendation letters cover all areas is to provide your recommenders with all the necessary information. Dont assume that they will remember everything about you. For example, a professor might remember that a student is exceptional and an excellent participant in class but may not recall all of the details when she sits down to write—how many classes the student took with her and extracurricular interests, such as being active in the psychology honors society.  Provide a file with all of your background information: TranscriptResume or curriculum vitaeAdmissions essaysCourses youve taken with each recommending professorResearch experienceInternship and other applied experiencesHonor societies to which you belongAwards youve wonWork experienceProfessional goalsDue date for the applicationCopy of the application recommendation forms (if a paper/hard copy letter is required and if the forms are provided by the institution)List of programs to which you are applying (and have them send email requests for recommendations early, well before the deadline) Importance of Confidentiality The recommendation forms supplied by graduate programs require you to decide whether to waive or retain your rights to see your recommendation letters. If you decide to retain your rights, remember that confidential recommendation letters tend to carry more weight with admissions committees. In addition, many faculty will not write a recommendation letter unless it is confidential. Other faculty may provide you with a copy of each letter, even if it is confidential. If you are unsure of what to decide, discuss it with a college adviser As the application deadline approaches, check with your recommenders—but dont nag. Contacting the graduate programs to inquire whether your materials were received is also appropriate. Regardless of the outcome of your application, send a thank you note once you have determined that faculty members have submitted their letters.

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Essay about Dbq 1 - 921 Words

It was inevitable and unavoidable that violence and dispossession were outcomes of the centuries-long confirmation of Native Americans with European settlers and their American descendants. European settlers were relentless whenever they were introduced to things that were appealing to their eye. If they wanted it, then they would go get it due to the superior mindset of the Europeans. European settlers first came to the New World for multiple reasons. It started with Christopher Columbus wanting to find a shorter and quicker route to the East. Failing to do so, he made the New World’s existence known to the Old World. It wasn’t just the Europeans who decided to come to the New World. The Spanish government was informed of the New World†¦show more content†¦He understood that Europeans and Natives both have cultural differences. One thing that seems very taboo to the Europeans may be very common for the Natives. The differences in cultures affect our mindset an d perspective on how we see things. Franklin understood that they had a different way of living life. (Doc 3) Shawnee leader, Tecumseh, was not a happy Native. He blamed the greed and oppression of the Europeans for the destruction of the Native American cultures. The Europeans greed led them to strip the land from the Natives, and try in forcing their religion upon the Natives. Tecumseh believed that the land was for all. There was nothing about selling, taking, and giving the land away. The Europeans just did not have that mindset at all. Red Jacket was a Seneca leader. He was very discouraged of the fact that they took the land of the Natives, but even more because they wanted to force their religion upon the Native Americans. The Europeans were ruthless when it came to this. They did not think about their feelings and the actions that could hurt the Natives. (Doc 4, 5, 6) In the 1800’s, U.S. Secretary of War amp; U.S. Secretary of Interior were both not very kind to the N atives. John C. Calhoun was U.S. Secretary in 1820 at the time. He believed that Native Americans had no right of ruling themselves. He believed that they were uncivilized and that they had no right of even being knownShow MoreRelatedap dbq 11003 Words   |  5 Pages14th, 2014 Graded Assignment Document-Based Question: Religious Views on War Complete and submit this assignment by the due date to receive full credit. (45 points) 1. To complete this Graded Assignment, retrieve the Religious Views on War DBQ. Use this document with its essay instructions and the DBQ Checklist to complete this DBQ essay. Please consult the rubric throughout the process. Using the documents, compare the views of major world religions on war. What additional kind of document(s)Read MoreDbq Essay 14488 Words   |  18 Pagesremains essentially the same: to ensure the wise use and management of renewable resources. Given the right circumstances, the living organisms that we call renewable resources can replenish themselves indefinitely. Click here to study this again.[-1] Question: There are four standard rifle shooting positions. Which position is best for learning the fundamentals of shooting? a. standing b. prone c. kneeling d. sitting Your answer: c Correct answer: b Explanation: The prone position is theRead MoreUnit 1 Dbq Essay761 Words   |  4 PagesAP U.S. History Unit I DBQ Essay They sailed over from England, all seeking glorified opportunities. These English colonists sought out an opportunity when boarding ships and leaving the Old World to travel to the exciting unknown; but each person had their own unique desire. These unique desires led to the many diverse societies that spread all throughout the eastern sea board of the New World by the 1700’s. Religious tolerance, organization in government, and economic stability were all contributingRead MoreAp Us History Unit 1 Dbq999 Words   |  4 PagesIn the years leading up to the American revolution it was evident that a new identity was developing for colonist. Stemming from the Seven Year’s colonists were slowly discovering a new way of viewing the mother country and themselves. By the eve of the American revolution most colonist had adopted the identity of British citizens fighting to protect their liberties. A strong bond of unity can be seen from colonists’ shared opinions and agr eed course of action, while a large loyalist population supportsRead MoreAlison Brady. Period 5. December 4, 2012. Dbq #1. Slavery1637 Words   |  7 PagesAlison Brady Period 5 December 4, 2012 DBQ #1 Slavery was the main cause of the breakup of the Union and influenced other factors, such as territorial expansion, industrialization and economic tensions, and political alignments. Combined, all of these conflicts, with slavery at the root, led to the conflicts in the nation that started the Civil War. The issue of slavery caused conflict regarding new territories, economic stratification, and political turmoil. All of these tensions served to divideRead MoreDBQ #1 : Political, Social and Economic effects of the American Revolution2546 Words   |  11 Pagesthe monarchy and the power of it back in England. As a whole America experienced major changes fundamentally in certain aspects and minor changes in other aspects. W O R K S C I T E D : Unknown. Document Information Inferences - DBQ 2005. Ravescroft.org. N.p., 2005. Web. 09 Oct. 2013. Unknown. True Womanhood. True Womanhood. CSI Library, n.d. Web. 09 Oct. 2013. Read MoreFederal Government of the United States and Territorial Expansion1101 Words   |  5 Pages2010 DBQ: (Form A) 1. In what ways did ideas and values held by Puritans influence the political, economic, and social development of the New England colonies from 1630 through the 1660s? (Form B) 1. The issue of territorial expansion sparked considerable debate in the period 1800–1855. Analyze this debate and evaluate the influence of both supporters and opponents of territorial expansion in shaping federal government policy. 2009 DBQ: (Form A) From 1775 to 1830, many African AmericansRead MoreRemoval of Indian Tribes in 17001389 Words   |  6 Pagesthe authority â€Å"to cause so much of any territory belonging to the United States, west of the Mississippi River, not including in any state or organized territory, and to which the Indian title has been extinguished, as he may judge necessary †¦Ã¢â‚¬  (DBQ Doc 1) Greed and hatred for the Indians was the reason for them be stripped of their land. The Indians were upset and fearful that they would lose all their land. They didn’t believe any treaties or deals made by the white man would be followed throughRead MoreAp Exam Essays1660 Words   |  7 PagesAP Exam Essays 2001-2010 2010 AP Exam Essays 1. In what ways did ideas and values held by Puritans influence the political, economic, and social development of the New England colonies from 1630 through the 1660s? 2. Analyze the political, diplomatic, and military reasons for the United States victory in the Revolutionary War. Confine your answer to the period 1775–1783. 3. Analyze the ways in which controversy over the extension of slavery into western territories contributed to the comingRead MoreThe Middle Ages : A Holy War Or Crusade Against Muslim Turks1357 Words   |  6 PagesEast are in Urgent need of your help†¦ For, as most of you have heard, the Turks and Arabs have attacked them and have conquered the territory of Romania,† the Pope is calling for the followers of the church to unite and fight against a common enemy (DBQ 1-13). The people in turn, joined forces and fought in Holy war or the first Crusade. This crusade also unified the Byzantine empire under the control of the Pope (Class Notes). The Byzantines were being threatened by invasion from the Turks. So because

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Just Dessert Free Essays

Just Dessert Name: ADJ/215 Date: Instructor: Just Dessert It is a normal feeling for people in our society to want someone to be punished for the crime they commit. Without any type of punishment it feels like justice was not served especially when there is a victim involved. This in many people’s eyes is a way to justify punishment and it is based on the just dessert theory. We will write a custom essay sample on Just Dessert or any similar topic only for you Order Now With this theory it is the belief that a person should be punished based on the harm they caused and the crime they committed. In other words the punishment should fit the crime. People who are for just dessert believe that retribution justifies punishment because it is deserving based on the crime. Where the opposing side believes that justification of punishment lies in the ability to prevent or minimize future harm. Arguments in Favor of Just Dessert When researching just dessert I found three particular arguments in favor of the just dessert theory. The first argument is that the punishment should be the same for all offenders based on the crime they committed. This is considered to be fair and justified punishment because it is deserving of the crime committed. The second argument supports that just dessert encompasses fair treatment both to the vulnerable in society and victims rather than just the offenders. This allows the victims of crimes to know what type of justice they can expect. And finally the third argument believes that the just desert theory is the best way to explain the death penalty for murder because if an offender takes a life they would understand and expect that their punishment would be a sentence of death. Arguments Against Just Dessert There are many arguments against the just desserts theory. Two significant arguments against the just dessert theory are that it gives an inadequate justification of bias or hate crimes and cannot explain the state’s democratic duty to protect the most vulnerable victims. Many opponents are concerned that the state legislatures will set unreasonably high sentences. Just dessert is also thought to be inflexible and fixed for every offender; very little if any consideration is given to the circumstances surrounding his or her crime. There is also a fear that just dessert would remove the rehabilitation aspect from prisons across the country. Those that choose to argue in favor of just dessert to support the continued use of the death penalty in the United States are missing, or choose to ignore, many fallacies with the argument of just dessert in support of the death penalty. An important point to keep in mind is that the United State is the only democracy in the world that still uses the death penalty as a possible punishment. (Foley, 2006). My Position is Against Just Dessert My position was assigned to be against just dessert. While researching just dessert and exploring both sides of the argument I can understand why people are against just dessert. It would seem that this theory would not be beneficial when it comes to certain types of crimes. â€Å"When dealing with a case of a single individual who has committed a crime, participants appeared insensitive to the factors that should drive sentencing when utilitarian goals are the motivating force; it was the factors relevant to the just deserts perspective that determined sentencing. (Carlsmith, Darley, Robinson, 2002). The sentence at an individual level seems to come from a strictly deservingness-based stance rather than taking into consideration the circumstances surrounding the crime when it comes to deciding punishment. Although the type of crime may be similar, no crime is the same or committed for the same reason. The theory of just dessert is retrospective rather than prospective. â€Å"The punisher need not be concerned with future outcomes, only with providing punishment appropriate to the given harm. Although it is certainly preferable that the punishment serve a secondary function of inhibiting future harmdoing, its justification lies in righting a wrong, not in achieving some future benefit. † (Carlsmith, Darley, Robinson, 2002). The belief is that the punishment should be proportionate to the harm the person caused. The problem becomes that our judicial system is not perfect and there are times when innocent people are convicted of a crime. If we utilize the just dessert theory with someone ho was convicted of murder we would sentence them to death. If the person was later found to be not guilty we would have murdered an innocent person based on this theory. References Carlsmith, K. M. , Darley, J. M. , Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why Do We Punish? : Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284-299. doi:10. 1037/0022-3514. 83. 2. 284 Foley, M. (2006). Toward Understanding the Death Penalty Debate. Retrieved from http://www. ala. org/ala/acrl/acrlpmbs/choice/content/essay. cfm How to cite Just Dessert, Papers

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

College The Path for Everyone free essay sample

In the United States today, there is a continuous debate about whether or not college is for everyone. Although many jobs are starting to require college degrees, people still argue that college is not necessary for everyone. Some feel that college is out of reach for certain middle and lower class citizens and therefore unnecessary. Many believe that no matter which field students go into, college is the right path. Certain people think that a college degree is only necessary depending on the path the student decides to take. Today, more jobs than ever require a college degree. People in the working class that have a college degree are said to be more successful than those without a degree. This statement is fairly true, yet, more and more children are not attending college. Many say this is due to either unwillingness or financial issues. Although colleges cannot necessarily persuade students to attend colleges, they have ways to financially help willing students. We will write a custom essay sample on College: The Path for Everyone? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page For the students that cannot afford to attend a college, financial aid programs allow willing students to attend college. This is one of the many aids that colleges offer. Although college is very expensive, a lot of people believe that it is worth the cost because it raises one’s chances of getting a successful career. With aids available and a higher chance of success, college is a very valuable post-secondary school choice. The purpose of college is not to receive a job, it is to educate and empower one’s self. Students that attend college also have highly developed skills in many different fields. With everything that colleges offer, students should pursue the opportunities available to them. Although college offers many opportunities, some believe that college is not meant for everyone. There are still some jobs today that don’t require a college degree. Therefore, many people believe that a nation that has a mix of people with and without degrees is beneficial. Our nation has noticed that well-paying jobs today require a college degree. Though this is true, many students are unwilling to put in the time and effort to go to college. That being said, college should be known as the correct post-secondary choice for our nation today.